How (and where) does moral judgment work?

نویسندگان

  • Joshua Greene
  • Jonathan Haidt
چکیده

Moral psychology has long focused on reasoning, but recent evidence suggests that moral judgment is more a matter of emotion and affective intuition than deliberate reasoning. Here we discuss recent findings in psychology and cognitive neuroscience, including several studies that specifically investigate moral judgment. These findings indicate the importance of affect, although they allow that reasoning can play a restricted but significant role in moral judgment. They also point towards a preliminary account of the functional neuroanatomy of moral judgment, according to which many brain areas make important contributions to moral judgment although none is devoted specifically to it.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

How Personality and Gender Relate to Ethical Judgment of Accountants: Evidence based on Discipline

CContrary to expectations, ethics research has shown that, accountants earn low ethical reasoning scores in the moral development tests, due to accountants focusing on agreeableness trait. However, ethical tests evaluate agreeableness trait up to the intermediate levels of the moral development model. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between five personality traits a...

متن کامل

Aesthetics with a Focus on the Concept of Ethics from the Perspective of Yuriko Saito

The paper examines the ethical dimension of Yuriko Saito’s aesthetics. Her recent work explicitly points to the inseparability of aesthetics from the rest of life, especially moral concerns. She believes that aesthetics requires overcoming the subject-object gap and adopting an open-minded attitude, responsiveness, interaction, and cooperation. These requirements not only define the nature of t...

متن کامل

How We Read People’s Moral Minds

Liane Young received her BA in philosophy (2004) and her PhD in psychology (2008) from Harvard University, after which she did postdoctoral work in MIT’s Brain & Cognitive Sciences Department. She is an assistant professor in the Department of Psychology at Boston College, where she studies the cognitive and neural basis of human moral judgment. Her current research focuses on the role of reaso...

متن کامل

The Enforcement of Moral Boundaries Promotes Cooperation and Prosocial Behavior in Groups

The threat of free-riding makes the marshalling of cooperation from group members a fundamental challenge of social life. Where classical social science theory saw the enforcement of moral boundaries as a critical way by which group members regulate one another's self-interest and build cooperation, moral judgments have most often been studied as processes internal to individuals. Here we inves...

متن کامل

Deontological coherence: A framework for commonsense moral reasoning.

We review a broad range of work, primarily in cognitive and social psychology, that provides insight into the processes of moral judgment. In particular, we consider research on pragmatic reasoning about regulations and on coherence in decision making, both areas in which psychological theories have been guided by work in legal philosophy. Armed with these essential prerequisites, we sketch a p...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Trends in cognitive sciences

دوره 6 12  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2002